Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Bernardi's avatar

"Here, I have measured economic dependency as the total number of non-workers (the population minus the labour force) divided by the population. So when the measure is 50%, it means that there is one worker for every two non-workers. When it is 40%, it means that there is one worker for every 1.5 non-workers."

Could you explain this please? Surely 50% would divide the workers and non-workers evenly leading to a one-to-one ratio.

Bill McLean's avatar

Where I see a problem is care within families. Having support from adult children makes a big difference to the quality of life of the elderly, even just getting help navigating government benefits. It seems like a bleak future if a much larger share of people have no children.

13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?