Great podcast! It’s great to see and hear the human behind Cremieux (I’m a fan).
Also, the litigation environment in the US is … unique. And most don’t understand the nature of tort law in the US and believe that outcomes align to “truths”. Litigation is about compelling narratives, drama, and emotions … not evidence.
To what extent do you think the rise in neuro-atypical diagnoses coincides with more female psychometric expectations based on women entering the academy and workforce + HR pathology?
Is he walking in place?
one of the best examples of this is the 1960s idea of population bomb that will lead to starvation
That academic idea led to western government literally destroying social order trying to lower birth rates ...
that can be traced back to all kinds of policies that led to exploding female labour participation, rise in house prices, urbanisation, etc https://rvs.su/sites/default/files/population_policy_-_will_current_programs_succeed.pdf
Well documented eugenicist btw
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan_Lasker
Economics is often presented as complicated and technical.
But some of the most important economic ideas can be explained with a single diagram.
In the 1970s, one simple picture — the Laffer Curve — helped reshape debates about tax policy.
Today we may need another simple picture to understand economic growth - a Bell Curve.
Article content
Please Read More - Paper: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6069647
Great podcast! It’s great to see and hear the human behind Cremieux (I’m a fan).
Also, the litigation environment in the US is … unique. And most don’t understand the nature of tort law in the US and believe that outcomes align to “truths”. Litigation is about compelling narratives, drama, and emotions … not evidence.
To what extent do you think the rise in neuro-atypical diagnoses coincides with more female psychometric expectations based on women entering the academy and workforce + HR pathology?